Modern architectural railway station interior

INFORMATION HEALTH CHECK

10 focused questions.

Quick to complete.

Human-reviewed result.

Kendi reviews your responses to identify potential strengths, gaps and unclear responsibilities across information requirements, traceability and acceptance.

Information Health Check

Can your information be trusted for the decision it must support?

This ten-question diagnostic examines the route from organisational need to accepted operational information.

Your result is not generated automatically. Responses are reviewed and assessed as Red, Amber or Green based on the clarity of requirements, responsibilities, traceability and acceptance.

GreenBroadly controlled and decision-ready.

AmberGaps exist and should be addressed.

RedMaterial weaknesses require attention.

About you

Who should receive the review?

* Required

Name *Email *Organisation (optional)Role / Job Title

What decision or operational activity must the information support? *

Describe the decision, activity or outcome that depends on the information.

Is there a named owner for that decision? *

The person or role accountable for the decision should be identifiable.

Is the information requirement written and measurable? *

The requirement should be clear enough to test whether it has been satisfied.

Are the provider, reviewer and receiver identified? *

Responsibility for producing, checking and receiving the information should be established.

Are the acceptance criteria defined before information is produced? *

People should know what will constitute acceptable information before the exchange takes place.

Can the current authorised version be identified? *

Users should be able to distinguish the current authorised information from superseded or working information.

Can its source and approval history be demonstrated? *

The route from creation through review and approval should be traceable.

Can the required information be retrieved promptly and reliably? *

Important information should be findable without relying on individual memory or unnecessarily lengthy searches.

Is rejected or superseded information controlled? *

Out-of-date or rejected information should not be easily mistaken for current accepted information.

Does accepted project information remain usable when it moves into operation? *

Accepted information should remain structured, understandable and usable beyond project delivery.

Optional context

Is there anything else we should understand before reviewing your answers?

What happens next?We review your responses, assign an overall Red, Amber or Green result, and identify the most important weaknesses or areas requiring clarification.

By submitting this Health Check, you acknowledge that Kendi will use the information provided to review your responses and contact you about the result. See our Privacy Policy.

Information Health Check

Can your information be trusted for the decision it must support?

This ten-question diagnostic examines the route from organisational need to accepted operational information.

Your result is not generated automatically. Responses are reviewed and assessed as Red, Amber or Green based on the clarity of requirements, responsibilities, traceability and acceptance.

GreenBroadly controlled and decision-ready.

AmberGaps exist and should be addressed.

RedMaterial weaknesses require attention.

About you

Who should receive the review?

* Required

Name *Email *Organisation (optional)Role / Job Title

What decision or operational activity must the information support? *

Describe the decision, activity or outcome that depends on the information.

Is there a named owner for that decision? *

The person or role accountable for the decision should be identifiable.

Is the information requirement written and measurable? *

The requirement should be clear enough to test whether it has been satisfied.

Are the provider, reviewer and receiver identified? *

Responsibility for producing, checking and receiving the information should be established.

Are the acceptance criteria defined before information is produced? *

People should know what will constitute acceptable information before the exchange takes place.

Can the current authorised version be identified? *

Users should be able to distinguish the current authorised information from superseded or working information.

Can its source and approval history be demonstrated? *

The route from creation through review and approval should be traceable.

Can the required information be retrieved promptly and reliably? *

Important information should be findable without relying on individual memory or unnecessarily lengthy searches.

Is rejected or superseded information controlled? *

Out-of-date or rejected information should not be easily mistaken for current accepted information.

Does accepted project information remain usable when it moves into operation? *

Accepted information should remain structured, understandable and usable beyond project delivery.

Optional context

Is there anything else we should understand before reviewing your answers?

What happens next?We review your responses, assign an overall Red, Amber or Green result, and identify the most important weaknesses or areas requiring clarification.

By submitting this Health Check, you acknowledge that Kendi will use the information provided to review your responses and contact you about the result. See our Privacy Policy.

Information Health Check

Can your information be trusted for the decision it must support?

This ten-question diagnostic examines the route from organisational need to accepted operational information.

Your result is not generated automatically. Responses are reviewed and assessed as Red, Amber or Green based on the clarity of requirements, responsibilities, traceability and acceptance.

GreenBroadly controlled and decision-ready.

AmberGaps exist and should be addressed.

RedMaterial weaknesses require attention.

About you

Who should receive the review?

* Required

Name *Email *Organisation (optional)Role / Job Title

What decision or operational activity must the information support? *

Describe the decision, activity or outcome that depends on the information.

Is there a named owner for that decision? *

The person or role accountable for the decision should be identifiable.

Is the information requirement written and measurable? *

The requirement should be clear enough to test whether it has been satisfied.

Are the provider, reviewer and receiver identified? *

Responsibility for producing, checking and receiving the information should be established.

Are the acceptance criteria defined before information is produced? *

People should know what will constitute acceptable information before the exchange takes place.

Can the current authorised version be identified? *

Users should be able to distinguish the current authorised information from superseded or working information.

Can its source and approval history be demonstrated? *

The route from creation through review and approval should be traceable.

Can the required information be retrieved promptly and reliably? *

Important information should be findable without relying on individual memory or unnecessarily lengthy searches.

Is rejected or superseded information controlled? *

Out-of-date or rejected information should not be easily mistaken for current accepted information.

Does accepted project information remain usable when it moves into operation? *

Accepted information should remain structured, understandable and usable beyond project delivery.

Optional context

Is there anything else we should understand before reviewing your answers?

What happens next?We review your responses, assign an overall Red, Amber or Green result, and identify the most important weaknesses or areas requiring clarification.

By submitting this Health Check, you acknowledge that Kendi will use the information provided to review your responses and contact you about the result. See our Privacy Policy.

Exploring how better information requirements, exchange and assurance support better decisions across the built environment.